Skip to content
PatentWorld

Act 6 — Deep Dives

Cross-Domain Comparison

A comparative view of twelve technology domains, covering total patent volumes, growth trajectories, quality benchmarks, and cross-domain spillover.

Act 6 Methods

The twelve ACT 6 Deep Dive chapters share a common analytical framework. The following metrics are used consistently across all domain analyses:

Four-Firm Concentration Ratio (CR4)
The combined patent share of the four largest assignees in a given domain-year. Higher values indicate greater organizational concentration. In the industrial organization literature, CR4 above 40% is typically classified as moderately concentrated and above 60% as highly concentrated (Bain, 1956; Shepherd & Shepherd, 2004).
Technology Diversity (Normalized Shannon Entropy)
Normalized Shannon entropy of the CPC subfield distribution within a domain: H/ln(N), where H = −Σ pi ln(pi) and N is the number of subfields. Values range from 0 (all patents in one subfield) to 1 (evenly distributed). Higher values indicate greater diversity across technology subfields.
Technology Velocity (Entry Cohort Productivity)
Average annual patents per assignee, computed by entry-decade cohort. Assignees are classified by the decade of their first patent in the domain. Higher velocity among later cohorts suggests that open-source diffusion or lower barriers to entry may be associated with faster patenting rates.
International Share
The percentage of domain patents whose primary inventor is located outside the United States. Based on the disambiguated location of the first-listed inventor.
Academic Share
The percentage of domain patents assigned to universities or research institutions, identified via the PatentsView assignee-type classification (types other than corporate or individual).

Domain Chapters

Patent Volume

Figure 1

Green Innovation and Semiconductors Dominate ACT 6 Patent Volumes

Total utility patents per domain (all years), ordered by volume.

Green innovation (Y02/Y04S) and semiconductors (H01L/H10) each exceed 400,000 patents. AI, cybersecurity, and digital health form a middle tier at 150,000–265,000. Quantum computing and blockchain remain niche domains.
Figure 2

Growth Trajectories Vary Sharply Across 12 Domains, From 3,166 Quantum to 618,404 Green Patents

Annual patent count per domain, 1990–2025. Each panel is independently scaled.

Semiconductors and biotech show mature, plateau-shaped curves. AI, blockchain, and quantum display rapid recent growth. Green and cyber peaked around 2019–2020 and have since plateaued.

Quality Benchmarks

Figure 3

Digital Health Leads in Citation Impact (5.75 Mean); Quantum Leads in Claims (19.34 Mean)

Mean forward citations (5-year), claims, and CPC scope for patents granted 2020–2024.

Quality metrics for the 2020–2024 period reveal distinct innovation profiles: digital health patents receive the most citations (5.75 mean), quantum computing patents have the most claims (19.34 mean), and 3D printing patents have the widest technological scope (4.63 mean CPC codes). Citation counts for recent patents are subject to truncation.

Cross-Domain Spillover

Co-Classification Lift Between Domain Pairs

Lift is the ratio of observed to expected co-occurrences of CPC codes from two domains on the same patent. A lift of 2.0 means patents are twice as likely to carry both domains' codes as random chance would predict. Pairs with fewer than 10 co-occurring patents are excluded.

Loading...

Continuation Filing Rates

Figure 4

Biotech Leads Domain Continuation Filing at 48.9% — Nearly Double the AgTech Rate of 25.2%

Share of patents with continuation, division, or CIP related filings by domain

Continuation filing rates vary substantially across domains. Biotechnology's 48.9% rate reflects the regulatory complexity and long development timelines of life sciences patents, where continuation filings are used to extend protection across related claims. Agricultural technology's 25.2% rate is the lowest, consistent with more straightforward patent protection strategies in precision agriculture.

Filing versus Grant Timelines

Figure 5

Filing-to-Grant Lag Varies Substantially Across 12 Domains

Annual patent filings (solid) versus grants (dashed) per domain, 1990–2025. Each panel is independently scaled.

The gap between filing and grant curves reflects patent examination backlogs and processing times. AI and green innovation show substantial filing-grant lags during peak growth years (2015–2020), while mature domains like semiconductors show tighter alignment. Blockchain's filing decline after 2019 is visible before the grant peak, indicating a multi-year pipeline of pending applications.

Data coverage: January 1976 through September 2025. All 2025 figures reflect partial-year data.